Against warfare of all sorts

Still violence is met with violence. But when it comes to warfare an incredible number of people fall into the pit of paying in the same currency and thereby become murderers as the others. With that they add more oil to the fire of war and the result as an exploded city on the news where many lye dead. Wasn't it Gandhi who said something like this; An eye for an eye will leave the whole world blind - yes it was Gandhi.

But now man has built nuclear weapons and all sorts which can destroy life on earth. He as even used nuclear weapons on people. But as everyone knows you cannot win a nuclear war. There are no winners in destruction, only destroyers. Everyone could perish.

And armies are usually governed by one maniac, a so-called alpha male/female who has lost his mind a long time ago and everybody just say yes to him - but the greatest moron in the world is the one who follows the greatest moron in the world.

All soldiers must obey, which doesnt make them a half-wits, but yes-wits, which is a certain type of a few-wit. They have renounced themselves to evil forces or armies of any sorts and simply do what they are told to do - to kill. And lets not forget that without them Hitler would have stood alone - or as it says in a fantastic song of Donovans: Universal Soldier. The world should not be armed, it should be disarmed. Warfare should be protested in a peaceful way and all men should be loved if possible, in my opinion.

One thing I would like to mention when it comes to wars, but that is religions that sometimes directly encourage war, as for example the Israelites believe that their god gave them the land beyond other men. But to me religions are a testimony to magnificent stupidity of men and are most likly to divide people into groups and fill their heads with glue. Nobody can prove or disprove the existence of a god or reincarnation, but thousand pages of religious texts, flawed as they are, make things worse in my opinion. Eventhough many things are said in religions that many can agree on, it doesnt have to mean that they are true.

But now days there is taking place another kind of warfare then the traditional one. But that is the warfare against nature. In about 150 years men has come halfway in destroying the earth with the increase in greenhouse gases, after another 150 years with the same continuation the life as we know it will be gone, in my opinion. The emission has been increasing year by year but not decreasing, which adds black on black. We are not doing nearly enough, but from where we have come, we may never be able to do enough.

Another thing that is taking place is the treatment of animals in factory farming. The animals have it about as bad as prisoners in Nazi concentration camps.

Even though all life should be celebrated it is time that people ask themselves if it is not right to limit having children, because endless population can never be.

 

The author is a nature abuser with a carbon-footprint and an animal abuser who eats pigs and eggs although in small quantities it is.


Að verða fullorðinn

.......er kannski að einhverju leyti að losna undan valdi annarra og hlusta á sjálfan sig. Og kannski verða jafningi en vera kóngurinn yfir sjálfum sér.

 

English version:

 

Becoming a grownup 

........is maybe to some extent getting from under the power of others and listening to oneself. And maybe becoming an equal but being the king over oneself.

 


You are a wimp

Here is a text fragment I am working on:

You are a wimp like your father who uses violence. 

In other words, it is inherited this way.

But in the light of that the authorities have blocked the love in my head, I will just say neutrally - it can be positive and it can be negative: Go your way.

It should be reported that the author is a scumbag and a wimp who eats pigs and eggs, but the animals suffer.


Þú ert aumingi

Hér er textabrot sem ég er að vinna að:

Þú ert aumingi einsog pabbi þinn sem beitir ofbeldi. 

Með öðrum orðum, þetta erfist svona.

En í ljósi þess að yfirvöld hafa blokkað kærleikann í höfðinu á mér, þá segi ég bara svona hlutlaust - það getur verið jákvætt og það getur verið neikvætt: Far þinn veg.

Það skal tekið fram að höfundur er óþverri og aumingi sem borðar svín og egg, en dýrin þjást.


Gegn hernaði hvers konar

Ennþá er ofbeldi svarað með ofbeldi. En þegar kemur að hernaði eru ótrúlega margir sem falla í þann pytt að gjalda líku líkt og verða með því morðingjar einsog hinir. Með því bæta þeir meiri olíu á ófriðarbálið og afraksturinn einsog sundursprengd borg í fréttatímanum þar sem margir liggja í valnum. Var það ekki Gandhi sem sagði eitthvað á þessa leið: Auga fyrir auga mun gera allan heiminn blindan- jú það var Gandhi.

En nú hefur maðurinn komið sér upp kjarnorkuvopnum og hverskonar sem getur tortímt lífi á jörðinni. Hann er meira að segja búinn að prufukeyra kjarnorkuvopn á fólki. En eins og allir vita er ekki hægt að vinna kjarnorkustríð. Það er enginn sigurvegari í eyðileggingu, aðeins eyðileggjendur. Það gætu allir farist.

Svo er herjum venjulega stjórnað af einum brjálæðingi, svokölluðum "alpha male/female" sem er búinn að missa vitið fyrir löngu og allir segja bara já við hann - en mesti hálfviti heimsins er sá sem fylgir mesta hálfvita heimsins. 

Allir hermenn verða að hlýða, sem gerir þá ekki að hálfvitum heldur jávitum, sem er sérstök tegund af fávita. Þeir eru búnir að afsala sér sjálfum sér til illra afla, eða herja hverskonar og gera einfaldlega það sem þeim er sagt að gera - að drepa. Og gleymum ekki að án þeirra hefði Hitler staðið einn - eða eins og segir í frábæru lagi Donovans: Universal Soldier. Heimurinn á ekki að vopnvæðast, hann á að afvopnast. Hernaði ætti að mótmæla með friðsamlegum hætti og elska ætti alla menn ef mögulegt, að mínu viti.

Eitt sem mig langar að minnast á þegar kemur að stríðum, en það eru trúarbrögðin sem stundum hvetja beinlínis til stríðs einsog t.d. Ísraelar trúa því að guð þeirra hafi gefið þeim landið umfram aðra menn. En fyrir mér eru trúarbrögðin til vitnis um stórkostlega heimsku mannanna og helst til þess fallin að skipta fólki í hópa og að fylla höfuð þess af lími. Það getur enginn sannað eða afsannað tilvist guðs eða endurfæðingar en þúsund síðna trúarrit og doðrantar, gallaðir einsog þeir eru, gera að mínu áliti hlutina verri. Þósvo það standi margt í trúarbrögðunum sem margir geta verið sammála um, þarf það ekki að vera að þau séu sönn.

Nú um stundir á sér stað annarskonar hernaður en sá hefðbundni, en það er hernaðurinn gegn náttúrunni. Á um það bil 150 árum er maðurinn kominn hálfa leið með að eyðileggja jörðina með aukningu gróðurhúsalofttegunda, eftir önnur 150 ár með sama áframhaldi verður lífið einsog við þekkjum það, farið, að mínu áliti. Losunin hefur verið að aukast ár frá ári en ekki minnka, sem bætir svörtu ofaná svart. Við erum ekki að gera nándar nógu mikið, en úr því sem komið er, munum við mögulega aldrei geta gert nóg.

Annað sem á sér stað er meðferðin á dýrunum í verksmiðjubúskapnum. Dýrin hafa það álíka slæmt og fangar í fangabúðum nasista. 

Þó fagna ætti öllu lífi er löngu kominn tími til að fólk spyrji sig hvort ekki sé rétt að stilla barneignum í hóf, því endalaus mannfjölgun getur aldrei orðið. 

 

Höfundur er náttúruníðingur með kolefnisspor og dýraníðingur sem borðar svín og egg þó í litlum mæli sé.


The greatest

The greatest moron in the world is the one who follows the greatest moron in the world.


Gangi ykkur vel

Ég óska ykkur góðs gengis að gera hreint fyrir ykkar dyrum. þið hafið tækifæri til þess núna.


Sá mesti

Mesti hálfviti í heimi er sá sem fylgir mesta hálfvita í heimi.


The Greenhouse_effect - in common language

All objects emit light that depends on their temperature (thermal radiation). This does not mean the visible light that comes from objects when sunlight falls on them or something like that, but light that depends on their temperature. The hotter the object, the more energetic the light. In ordinary objects this light is invisible, (is, for example, in the infrared region), but if the object is heated more, it begins to illuminate in the visible region (such as red-hot iron).

 

The sun warms the earth's surface and the earth radiates invisible light depending on its temperature in each place. In the atmosphere there are gases, for example greenhouse gases that "absorb" part of this light and then the molecules begin to rotate and vibrate more and with that it heats up. This is not completely different from what happens in a microwave oven. The microwave oven makes invisible light, which the oven produces in a certain way and the food in it absorbs this light, which causes the molecules in the food to rotate and with that it heats up.

 

When the earth radiates its invisible light, some of it would just go into space, but when more greenhouse gases are added, more of the heat is absorbed by the atmosphere and some of it is radiated back to the earth.

 

The problem is mainly fossil fuels, oil, gas and coal. When burned, the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide is formed. Someone may then ask if the man has not always been burning firewood and thereby producing carbon dioxide. Yes, that's right, but what happened then was that plants absorbed the carbon dioxide that was created by the fire, as well as water and sunlight, and produced from it oxygen and carbohydrates, in a process called photosynthesis, so this was a cycle in which the carbon dioxide formed by the fire of the firewood was occupied by other plants and the amount of carbon dioxide remained fairly stable in the atmosphere. When fossil fuels are burned, on the other hand, carbon is added to the carbon cycle and carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, causing increased greenhouse effect, whereas larger portion of the earth’s thermal radiation is absorbed by the atmosphere and some of it is radiated back to earth. It should be noted that part of the added carbon dioxide goes into the sea and causes ocean acidification.

 

Without the greenhouse effect it would not be habitable on earth, it would simply be too cold, but the increase in greenhouse gases could be causing rapid warming.


Competition

It is always said that competition is a good thing, but the downside to competition is that there are winners and losers. Sometimes this applies to whole continents, for example the United States and Africa - winners and losers. How is, for example, Zimbabwe supposed to compete with the USA? They are far behind in development. The rich get richer....... Possibly the world would be a better place if there was more cooperation and less competition.

 

  ......Then another possibility could be that the state would establish various companies and compete with the private companies. Then those who had interest and ability to start a company would still be free to do so, but if the state made a profit from its operations, there could possibly be a fairer distribution of wealth in the world.


Næsta síða »

Innskráning

Ath. Vinsamlegast kveikið á Javascript til að hefja innskráningu.

Hafðu samband